Timeless or timely

Over at Harriet, one of their poetry month guest bloggers, Rachel Zucker starts off with this question:

Is it more important to you that your poems be timeless or timely and why?

Why the absurdly simplistic (and plain absurd) dichotomy? Implied: it can only be one or the other. Implied: politics have no place in poetry. Implied: poetry should be distanced from the world. But surprising from Zucker, whose poetry is so engaged.

Perhaps she’s playing into the common (mis)understanding of poetry’s limits and what it SHOULD AND SHOULD NOT do. I’ll be interested to see where this develops, that’s for sure. In any case, examples of both:

Whitman, Hughes, Lorde, Rich, Neruda, Cesaire, Darwish…just to start.

Poetry should do both. Reflect on the now, for the forever. It can and must.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: